An overview of the arguments against and in favor of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia

End of Life Suicide:

An overview of the arguments against and in favor of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia

Tremendous pain and suffering of patients can be saved. The right to die should be a fundamental freedom of each person. Patients can die with dignity rather than have the illness reduce them to a shell of their former selves.

Health care costs can be reduced, which would save estates and lower insurance premiums. Nurse and doctor time can be freed up to work on savable patients. Prevention of suicide is a violation of religious freedom.

An overview of the arguments against and in favor of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia

Pain and anguish of the patient's family and friends can be lessened, and they can say their final goodbyes. Reasonable laws can be constructed which prevent abuse and still protect the value of human life.

Vital organs can be saved, allowing doctors to save the lives of others. Without physician assistance, people may commit suicide in a messy, horrifying, and traumatic way. It would violate doctors' Hippocratic oath.

It demeans the value of human life. It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.

Doctors and families may be prompted to give up on recovery much too early. Government and insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.

Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Jack Kevorkian gained world attention by assisting in several suicides to dying patients; he was sentenced to over 60 years for his efforts, despite the gratitude of the patients and their families.

Recent laws in Oregon and the U. But some, most notably the U. Attorney General's office, are determined to prevent the laws from going through.May 20,  · It is important to note that both terms, “physician assisted suicide” and “physician aid-in-dying” are value-laden and may reflect the speaker or writer’s political or ideological support for or objection to the practice.

An overview of the arguments against and in favor of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia

Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia were explicitly proscribed in the Hippocratic Oath. Although this was a minority opinion when introduced years ago, the Hippocratic outlook gradually became the dominant influence for practitioners of .

According to one study that poses a similar argument about assisted suicide or euthanasia, “About two-thirds of oncology patients and the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide acceptable for patients with unremitting pain.

Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia were explicitly proscribed in the Hippocratic Oath.

Physician Aid-in-Dying: Ethical Topic in Medicine

Although this was a minority opinion when introduced years ago, the Hippocratic outlook gradually became the dominant influence for practitioners of modern medicine. Reports from the Netherlands, where euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are legal, reveal that doctors do not always report it.

The assumption that patients should have a right to die would impose on doctors a duty to kill . Without physician assistance, people may commit suicide in a messy, horrifying, and traumatic way. It would violate doctors' Hippocratic oath. It demeans the value of human life. It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.

Many .

Argument in Favor of Euthanasia or Physician Assisted Suicide (Annotated Bibliography Included)